1 For sentimental references to the treaty system, see particularly John K. Fairbank, “The Creation of the Treaty System,” in The Cambridge History of China, Vol.10. Late Ch’ing, 1800–1911. Part 1 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978).
2 Peter Duus, Ramon H. Meyers and Mark R. Peattie, eds., The Japanese Informal Empire in China, 1895–1937 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989).
3 Key-Hiuk Kim, The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order: Korea, Japan, and the Chinese Empire, 1860–1882 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980); Wang Shaofang, Zhongguo Wai Jiao Shi: Yapian Zhan Zhen Zhi Xin Hai Ge Ming Shi Qi, 1840–1911 (Diplomatic story of China from the Opium War to the 1911 Revolution) (Kaifeng: Henan ren min chu ban she, 1988); Kim Key-Hiuk, “Kaehangŭl Tullŏssan Kukchejŏngch’I (International Politics surrounding the Opening of Portsin Korea),” Han’guksa Simin’gangjwa 7 (August 1990); Lee Byeong Cheon, “Kaehanggwa Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyakch’ejeŭi Hwangnip (A Study on the Establishment of the Unequal Treaty System during the Port: Opening Period),” Kyŏngjesahak 8 (December 1990).
4 Yamamoto Shigeru, Jōyaku Kaiseishi (History of Treaty Amendment) (Tokyo: Kousan Shouin, 1943); Inō Tentaro, Higashiajia Ni Okeru Fubyōdō Jōyaku Taisei To Kindai Nihon (Modern Japan and the Unequal Treaty System in East Asia) (Tokyo: Iwata Shoin, 1995).
6 Michael R. Auslin, Negotiating with Imperialism: The Unequal Treaties and the Culture of Japanese Diplomacy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009).
7 Iokibe Kaoru, Jōyaku Kaiseishi: Hōken Kaifuku eno Tenbō to Nashonarizumu (Meiji Treaty Revision: Prospect for a Unified jurisdiction and Nationalism) (Tokyo: Yūhikaku, 2010).
8 In Korea, some researches were conducted from 2004 to 2006 under the theme of the Great Powers’ Extraterritoriality during the Open-Door Period in Chosun Dynasty. Lee Eun-Ja, Jung Tae-sub, and Han Sung-min studied the subject of China’s Exercise of ‘Extraterritoriality’ and Korea’s Response, Han Cheol-ho and Chung Koo-sun, Japan’s Exercise of ‘Extraterritoriality’ and Korea’s Response, and Yang Hong-seuk, the U. S. America’s Exercise of ‘Extraterritoriality’ and Korea’s Response. In this article, I do not give a list of theses of the above researchers related to extraterritoriality.
9 Han Cheol-ho, “Kabogaehyŏk·Agwanp’ach’ŏn’gi (1894~1897) Ilbonŭi Ch’ioebŏpkwŏn Haengsawa Chosŏnŭi Taeŭng (Japan’s Exercise of ‘Extraterritoriality’ and Korea’s Response, 1894~1897),” Han’gungminjogundongsayŏn’gu 56 (September 2008).
10 See the next articles on Tumojin incident. Kim Kyung-Tae, “Kaehangjikhuŭi Kwansegwŏn Hoebongmunje: ‘Pusanhaegwan Susesagŏn’ŭl Chungsimŭro (The Restoration of Tariff-rights in the Late 19th Century: The Case of ‘Pusan Tariff Incident’),” Han’guksayŏn’gu 8 (September 1972); Park Han-min, “1878nyŏn Tumojin Suserŭl Tullŏssan Choil Yanggugŭi Insikkwa Taeŭng (The recognition and response of the Korea and Japan surrounding the Tumojin Incident in 1878),” Hanilgwan’gyesayŏn’gu 39 (August 2011).
11 Kim Kyung-Tae, “Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyak Kaejŏnggyosŏbŭi Chŏn’gae: 1880nyŏn Chŏnhuŭi Taeil ‘Minjongmunje’ (Negotiations for the Amendment of the unequal treaty: ‘National problem’ against Japan around 1880),” Han’guksayŏn’gu 11 (September 1975).
12 Kim Kyung-Tae, “Kaehangjikhuŭi Kwansegwŏn Hoebongmunje,” 693–723; Park Han-min, “1878nyŏn Tumojin Suserŭl Tullŏssan Choil Yanggugŭi Insikkwa Taeŭng,” 379–96.
16 Han Seunghoon, “Choyŏngjoyak (1883.11) kwa Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyakch’ejeŭi Chaejŏngnip (The Treaty Concluded between Korea and Britain in 1883 and the Reconstruction of the Unequal Treaty System),” Han’guksayŏn’gu 135 (December 2006): 225–6.
18 Nihon Gaikō Monjo (Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy), ed. Gaimushō, vol. 14 (Tokyo: Nihonkokusairengōkyōkai, 1951), 315–20.
19 Jōyakukaiseikankei Nihongaikōbunsho (Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy: Treaty Amendments), ed. Nihon Gakujutsu Shinkōkai, vol. 1 (Tokyo: Nihon Kokusai Rengō Kyōkai, 1951), 12–49.
21 “The Agent also sketched out a draft Treaty of Commerce and Friendship, framed in a liberal spirit, with a fixed Tariff at 10 per cent. upon the chief articles only of import,” Kennedy to Granville, Tokio, November 21, 1880 (Received January 3, 1881), No.179, FO 46/258. (FO: Records created or inherited by the Foreign Office in the UK).
22 Song Byeong-Ki, “Kimyunsik, Leehongjangŭi Pojŏng·Ch’ŏnjinhoedam (Sang): Chomijoyak Ch’egyŏl (1882) ŭl Wihan Choch’ŏnggyosŏp (Kim Yun-Sik - Li Hung-chang Talks at Poating and Tientsin: The Korean-Chinese Negotiations for the Conclusion of Korean-American Treaty in 1882),” Tongbanghakchi 44 (November 1984): 184–5.
24 Jōyakukaiseikankei Nihongaikōbunsho Bessatsu Jōyakukaiseikeikagaiyō (Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy Supplement: Chronology of Treaty Amendments) (Tokyo: Nihon Kokusai Rengō Kyōkai, 1950), 189–200.
25 Song Byeong-Ki, ed., Kaebangkwa Yesok (Seoul: Tan’guk Taehakkyo, 2000), 62; “The True Policy for Corea: a Private Memorandum by Huang Tsun-hsien, Secretary of the Chinese Legation in Japan,” Inclosure in No.47, FO 881/4595.
27 Research into the process of the second Korea-Britain Treaty is discussed below. Kim Hyun-soo, Taeyŏngjegugŭi Tongasia Oegyojuyŏk: Haeri S. P‘ak’ŭsŭ (Harry S. Parkes: Leader of Great Britain’s diplomacy in East Asia) (Yongin: Dankook University Press, 2011); “P’ak’ŭsŭ (Sir Harry Parkes) Kwallyŏn Saryodŭrŭl T’onghae Pon ‘Hanyŏngsuhot’ongsangjoyak’ Ch’egyŏl Kwajŏng (A Study of the Anglo-Korean Treaty by Reviewing Sir H. Parkes’ Documents),” Yŏnggugyŏn’gu 11 (June 2004); Han Seunghoon, “Choyŏngjoyak (1883. 11) kwa Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyakch’ejeŭi Chaejŏngnip.”
28 The Imo rebellion was an uprising caused by an old-fashioned army and anti-foreign party centred on King Kojong’s father, so called Heungsŏn Taewŏngun, that were alienated from the Korean government’s progressive reform policy in July 1882.
29 “It was difficult for Corea to preserve her integrity unless she received either the material or moral support of some more powerful state and it was natural that material support should be extended by a neighbouring Power.” Francis C. Jones, “Foreign Diplomacy in Korea 1866~1894” (PhD diss., Harvard University, 1935), 345.
30 “He (Inoue Kaoru) clearly intimated to them (Korean Envoys) that Japan could not agree to a higher Customs Tariff than that which Corea had lately accorded to China, and which was settled on a basis of 5 per cent.” Parkes to Granville, Tôkiô, January 12, 1883. No.3 (Confidential). FO 405/33.
31 “It denoted, he observed, that China intended to assume great powers of control over Corea, and to secure exclusive commercial privileges in that country. He believed this action to be chiefly directed against Japan, although it also materially affected the interests of those nations who were about to enter into Treaty relations with Corea. He was anxious to know what course would be taken by the Powers who had made Treaties with Corea, and he desired that the action of the Japanese Government should be influenced by and should conform, if circumstances so permitted, with their proceedings.” Parkes to Granville, Tôkiô, December 21, 1882, No.172 (Confidential), FO 405/33.
32 “Corea could not expect Western Powers, any more that Japan, to accept a Tariff of 10 to 30 per cent. on their imports when those of China were to be admitted at 5 per cent., as it would be impossible for other foreigners to compete with Chinese under such conditions.” Parkes to Granville, Tôkiô, January 12, 1883. No.3 (Confidential), FO 405/33.
34 Parkes to Granville, Tôkiô, April 21, 1883. No.59 (Confidential), FO 405/33; Han Seunghoon, “Choyŏngjoyak (1883. 11) kwa Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyakch’ejeŭi Chaejŏngnip,” 223–7.
38 Hughes to Granville, Shanghae, May 30, 1883, No.131 (Confidential), FO 405/33; Han Seunghoon, “Choyŏngjoyak (1883. 11) kwa Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyakch’ejeŭi Chaejŏngnip,” 239.
40 Han Seunghoon, “19Segi Huban Chosŏnŭi Taeyŏngjŏngch’aek Yŏn’gu (1874~1895): Chosŏnŭi Kyunsejŏngch’aekkwa Yŏnggugŭi Kansŏpchŏngch’aegŭi Kwan’gye Chŏngnipkwa Kyunyŏl (Korean Policy toward Britain in the late 19th century: The Establishment and Rupture between Korean Policy of Balance of Power and British Policy of Intervention)” (PhD diss., Korea University, 2015), 98.
43 Yunch’ihoilgi, September 9, 1883; Han Seunghoon, “Choyŏngjoyak (1883.11) kwa Pulp’yŏngdŭngjoyakch’ejeŭi Chaejŏngnip,” 242.
45 Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce (written by Chairman: F. B. Johnson) to Granville, Hong Kong, January 20, 1883. Inclosure 2 in No.48, FO 405/33.
Korean Draft Treaty in 1881 (新修通商章程草案)18 | Japanese Draft Treaty in 188019 | China or Japan Treaties with Western powers | |
---|---|---|---|
Tariff Rate on Imports | ship’s stores: 5% | medicine, minerals, corn: 5% | 5% |
articles of daily use: 10% | metal, clothing and so on: 10% | ||
Luxury goods: 25% | natural oil, paper, and so on: 15% | ||
a domestic, oil, and so on: 20% | |||
oil: 35% | luxuries, and so on: 25% | ||
tobacco, alcoholic beverages and so on: 30% | |||
Tariff Rate on Exports | 5% | 5% | 5% |
Tariff Autonomy | yes | yes | no |
Treaties between Korea and Western powers (the United States, Britain, and Germany) in 1882 | Japanese Draft Treaty in 188224 | |
---|---|---|
Tariff Rate on Imports | articles of daily use: not to exceed an ad valorem duty of 10 % | 5% |
10% | ||
luxury items: not to exceed an ad valorem duty of 30% | 15% | |
20% | ||
25% | ||
Tariff Rate on Exports | 5% | 5% |
Tariff Autonomy | yes | yes |